Member-only story

Just War Against Terror: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Ethics of Counterterrorism

Joe Simmons

·8.8k Followers· Follow

Published in Just War Against Terror: The Burden Of American Power In A Violent World

6 min read · 1 week before

1.1k View Claps

71 Respond

Save

Listen

Terrorism is one of the most pressing challenges facing the world today. In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the United States and its allies launched a global war on terror, which has involved military interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries. The war on terror has raised a number of complex moral questions, including the following:

Just War Against Terror: The Burden Of American Power In A Violent World

by John Higley

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	451 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	164 pages

Is it morally justified to use military force against terrorists?
What are the limits of permissible force in counterterrorism operations?
What are the ethical obligations of states to protect their citizens from terrorism?

Just War Against Terror provides a comprehensive analysis of these and other ethical questions that arise in the fight against terrorism. The book draws on the just war tradition, a body of moral reflection on the ethics of war that has been developed over centuries by theologians, philosophers, and legal scholars. The book also examines the ethical implications of specific counterterrorism policies and practices, such as targeted killings, drone strikes, and mass surveillance.

Just War Against Terror is a timely and important contribution to the debate on the ethics of counterterrorism. The book provides a clear and concise overview of the key ethical issues involved in the fight against terrorism, and it offers a thoughtful and nuanced analysis of the complex moral questions that arise in this context.

The Just War Tradition

The just war tradition is a body of moral reflection on the ethics of war that has been developed over centuries by theologians, philosophers, and legal scholars. The just war tradition provides a set of criteria that can be used to assess the morality of war. These criteria include the following:

Just cause: War must be fought for a just cause, such as self-defense or the defense of others from harm.
Right intention: War must be fought with the right intention, such as to restore justice or to protect the innocent.
Proportionality: The violence used in war must be proportionate to the harm caused by the enemy.
Discrimination: War must be fought in a way that discriminates between combatants and non-combatants.
Last resort: War should only be used as a last resort, after all other means of resolving the conflict have failed.

The just war tradition provides a useful framework for assessing the morality of counterterrorism operations. However, it is important to note that the just war tradition is not a set of absolute rules. Rather, it is a set of principles that can be applied to specific cases in a way that is sensitive to the particular circumstances.

The Ethics of Counterterrorism

The ethics of counterterrorism is a complex and challenging field of study. There are no easy answers to the moral questions that arise in the fight against terrorism. However, by drawing on the just war tradition and other ethical resources, we can develop a more nuanced and informed understanding of the ethical challenges involved in counterterrorism.

One of the most important ethical questions that arises in the fight against terrorism is the question of whether it is morally justified to use military force against terrorists. The just war tradition provides a number of criteria that can be used to assess the morality of using military force in counterterrorism operations. These criteria include the following:

Just cause: Is the use of military force necessary to defend against an imminent threat to the state or its citizens?
Right intention: Is the use of military force intended to protect the innocent and restore justice?
Proportionality: Is the violence used in the military operation proportionate to the harm caused by the terrorists?
Discrimination: Is the military operation carried out in a way that discriminates between combatants and non-combatants?
Last resort: Has the state exhausted all other means of resolving the conflict before resorting to military force?

The use of military force against terrorists is morally justified only if it meets all of these criteria. In many cases, it will be difficult to satisfy all of these criteria. However, the just war tradition provides a useful framework for assessing the morality of using military force in counterterrorism operations.

Another important ethical question that arises in the fight against terrorism is the question of what are the limits of permissible force in counterterrorism operations. The just war tradition provides a number of guidelines that can be used to answer this question. These guidelines include the following:

Proportionality: The violence used in counterterrorism operations must be proportionate to the harm caused by the terrorists.
Discrimination: Counterterrorism operations must be carried out in a way that discriminates between combatants and non-combatants.

Just War Against Terror: The Burden Of American Power In A Violent World

by John Higley

4.5 out of 5